Leadership

Wood And Fire Risk: Where Fallacy And Facts Meet Homebuilding

Here, from Construction Physics' Brian Potter, is an evidence-based look at one of new-home construction's more combustible debates.

John McManus July 9th, 2021

It's one of residential construction's combustible topics.

Brian Potter is a structural engineer who writes here on "Wood Construction and the Risk of Fire."

History, physics, data science, engineering and materials science, regulation and local/regional/state and federal policy, construction practices, climate, environmental science and geography, insurance claims, special interest narratives, all get the 3rd degree in Potter's deep dive – sporting both literature search and first-hand reporting and research chops –  into one of the 2020s hottest challenges for housing leaders.

Potter starts with a caveat in his analysis, stating that his analysis here covers light framed wood construction, not heavy timber construction, such as CLT. This speaks to the vast majority of timber-frame residential building in the U.S.

Risk he focuses on is not reputational, rhetorical, or narrative, but rather risk to health and safety, and risk to property damage.

In 21 graphics, tables, physics equations, heat-maps, and diagrams, Potter works through the issues with wood and fire, alternative construction material options, trends, tactics, and scenarios.

Source: Alexandra Syphard and Jon E. Keeley

He concludes:

Overall, it seems like wood construction does somewhat increase the potential risk of fire, mostly by allowing fires that do occur to be somewhat deadlier and more destructive. However, this effect is mostly swamped by other factors such as what state and city you live in, or whether you live in a house or an apartment. For a wood apartment in Salt Lake City, the risk of fire is vanishingly small; for a wood single family home in a tiny town in Arkansas, it’s much larger.
The most important factor for fire risk in a home is whether or not it’s sprinklered. Fire sprinklers reduce the risk of fire by an enormous amount, and sprinklered wood construction seems to perform about as well as sprinklered non-combustible construction. And sprinklers are cheap, costing about $1-2 per square foot (much less than it would cost to say, change a wood house to concrete).
For wildfires specifically, we see something similar - construction details such as fire protected eaves and class A roofs, along with things like community density, matter far more than whether your home is wood or steel.

Join the conversation

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

John McManus

John McManus

President and Founder

John McManus, founder and president of The Builder’s Daily, is an award-winning editorial, programming, and digital content strategist. TBD's purpose is a community capable of constant improvement.

RELATED

Bellwether Lennar Sets A Pace That Challenges Others On Price

In ultra-concentrated markets where big nationals have deepened scale, where the public companies lead on price, private homebuilders hardly dare not to follow.


A Real-Time Practical Survive-To Thrive Field Guide For What's Next

Almost all of the risk preparation builders and developers need to do to weather late '22 and 2023 should already have been done -- and in many cases, has. Still, it's not too late to cut losses and secure gains for the next stretch. Here's how.


For Bumpy Months Ahead, Doing More With Less Is Not An Option

From Q4 '22 through the end of '23, homebuilders that ramped up operations will now have to reset resources to an evolving, indefinite new reality ... a period that may require an focused 'what-not-to-do' list.